Friday, January 8, 2010

Do You Believe in Miracles?

As part of my sermon series "Unbelievable", I've been realizing that one 12 minute sermon is in no way adequate enough to cover the topics that we're covering. After all, when you're trying to tackle the doctrines that people deem as unbelievable...it takes some argument and convincing. Plus, most of them are so multi-faceted that it's hard to cover all the questions. That being said, here is the supplementary blog if you are looking to dive into your faith, and not afraid to come out on the other side with more questions and more answers at the same time.

This week: Miracles of Jesus

I'm only covering the miracles of Jesus because Jesus is the one person in the Bible that uniquely is God incarnate. We established that we believe in the virgin birth and the incarnation last week, so I want to stick with the person of Jesus as God. The other miracles of the Old Testament and the apostles can more easily be written off as "speculation" or "perspective" than can the miracles of Jesus. Because, if the miracles of Jesus are proven to be unbelievable...then why believe in just an ordinary guy with good ideas? Are the miracles themselves not a proof of divine authority? So...can you believe in miracles?

The argument against:
The argument against and for miracles really comes down to one thing, your belief in the authenticity of scripture. Do you believe every word as sacred, or do you think people corrupted it as it was written? Do you think that God guided every thought, but gave the writers free will, or do you think the writers were simply trying to record a story with an intent behind that process? Whatever you choose, the miracles are going to take on a different meaning.

John Shelby Spong, known to be a demythologizing theologian (meaning that he takes the myth out of the story to find what he feels is the meat) claims that in the Jewish midrash (wisdom/commentary) tradition that all important events in the present must be venerated by great events in the past. This is like saying that all things we hold dear must be grounded in tradition and experience. Not absurd in the least bit. However, when taken in the context of Jesus, who was Jewish and lived in a Jewish world, and in the context of Jewish writers (Matthew, John, Paul) the idea prooves dangerous to those who hold every word as literal. What Spong means is that the parting of the waters of the Jordan River when Jesus is baptized are related to the myth/story of the parting of the Red Sea that was so dear to the identity of Israel's formation as a nation. The miracle of the feeding of the 5,000 that were no where near a market or their homes relates back to the miraculous feeding of the Hebrews in the wilderness by God. If I read this as a non-believer I would say that they made this up about Jesus to give him power. From a believer's perspective it means to me that Spong thinks maybe this stuff didn't actually happen, but there was something about Jesus that was special enough that the writers had to venerate him with history. So the miracles would then just be a literary technique to prove a point.

The other opposing argument would be, "what have you shown me lately?" Miracle healings are not exactly a dime a dozen these days, at least not by someone spitting in the mud and putting it on someone's eyes or touching someone. There are denominations that believe strongly in laying on of hands, annointing with oil or praying over someone...but they are not always successful. So why, when we are told we have the power, do we not have the power?

Some say that the person needing healing doesn't have enough faith, which is probably true, but dangerous to say when a drug dealer is shot and miraculously lives because the bullet hit his fat stack of cash. Others would say that God needs others more than the ones that die...which might be true, but I'd like to think that the child who dies in child birth did not get killed by God to serve as a momentary function or lesson for the grieving parents and doctors.

So the question remains..."why isn't the power of Jesus present today in healings and walking on water and stuff?"

The argument for miracles:
First of all, the argument for miracles goes to the same thing that Spong says...perspective. Millions of people over the centuries have claimed miraculous things to have happened, only about an eigth of which are bodily healings. They think they see Jesus in a Cheeto (and subsequently auction it on ebay) or the virgin Mary in an oil stain on a wall. Others claim to have talked to a stranger that led them to another place, only to never ever see the stranger again, but in the other place find a way to help another family or to find healing themselves. Others claim to sense God's presence as their plane was going down or in other accidents and realize that God caused them to be safe.

All of these are miracles in the eye of the beholder, it is usually sceptics that do not agree.

The biggest issue, if we're going to make a case for miracles, is why some people experience them and others do not.

1st answer :: We don't know. No matter who claims to know what God's will is, no one really knows. It's the mystery we have to live with. Although, I would claim that I do not believe that God's will is for some people to suffer at God's hands, in order that they or others would learn. It doesn't match up with the God of love everyone talks about, or else that lesson REALLY needs to be learned. However, despite me saying this...I don't know how God thinks ultimately.

2nd answer :: we need to redefine miracles.

This can include the spectacular of "the car just stopped without me pushing the brake right before I got hit by a train", but I feel that miracles need to be looked at for what the definition is, "an extraordinary event that manifests divine intervention in the world." By this definition miracles can be as small as a calling by God towards a certain school or job, or as large as a miraculous healing of cancer.

This is the best argument I have heard about the existence of miracles, to redefine our expectation of miracles, because so often we miss God's intervention in our lives while we look for what we want to see. I can completely understand why someone would want the result to be the cancer to go away, but sometimes the miracle is the reconciliation that happens between people when one is dying and life gains a whole new perspective. Sometimes the miraculous scene of a car crash, when someone claims that "God was watching over them" truly might have been a miracle...but not that no one was hurt. If God was watching over them, then heaven is an attractive offer. But the miracle might just be the transformation that occurs after that. If we're honest with ourselves...it might have been dumb luck that you walked away. But it is no accident that you believe God was involved and your life changes after that. God often shows up in the accident, not before it. God doesn't cause them...God heals them...and often not in the way we want, but in the way he wants.

I believe that life in a whole sense is more important to God than life in a biological sense, and ought to be for Christians too. It is said by Jesus that someone who gives their life for a friend is the greatest, and that is a physical giving, but there is something behind there I believe that dedicating one's life, allowing your whole person to be in line with one cause is the greatest. Sacrificing makes one the greatest.

Obviously God thinks organs and blood and life is important, and as Christians, I don't think bodily resurrection would be important to us if we didn't think God thought this was important too. However, would God want a bunch of people who are alive...or would God want a bunch of people who are living life to the fullest? I think the latter. Miracles I believe are ways in which God directs us and intervenes in our lives to guide us towards a more full life, which includes reconciliation, compassion, kindness, generosity, prayer and relationship. Many times the blood may go out of us and we don't get the healing we look for, but we take the time to love the dying person or the people around us as we are dying and we get the healing that we need. We revert back to the image of God that we were intended to be. And that is miraculous.

No comments:

Post a Comment